Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groep fan Auwerk
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- Groep fan Auwerk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 23:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. I've found and added newspaper articles about the group and its activities, and expect to find more (I have so far looked only in Dutch media, not German). There is also an M.A. thesis giving political background and discussing the group, which I have added as further reading. I'm not sure this is a reliable source, but it further indicates they are being talked about in independent media and therefore do meet GNG. Yngvadottir (talk) 08:11, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Your sources are about their new flag design and about a campaign with stickers/labels. There is no effective information about the group itself. The whole group might well be just a single person sending out press releases. Even the thesis tells nothing about the group itself, just reflects on a few activities and published ideas. The Banner talk 11:21, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Those are what they're doing. I'm not passing judgement on their effectiveness (or their objective). But had you yet seen this article in de Volkskraant? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I have seen that one. It tells about spreading stickers and the amusement of others about that. No serious information about the group. The Banner talk 21:46, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- For the record geenstijl is not a reliable source. Natuur12 (talk) 13:15, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I have seen that one. It tells about spreading stickers and the amusement of others about that. No serious information about the group. The Banner talk 21:46, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Those are what they're doing. I'm not passing judgement on their effectiveness (or their objective). But had you yet seen this article in de Volkskraant? Yngvadottir (talk) 18:43, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:37, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Comment I have deleted the interwikilink to the dutch wikipedia. Article there has been deleted for niet encyclopedisch (niet belangrijk genoeg) [1]. The nl:Fryske Rie (Interfrisian Council) also doesn't list them: [2] and shows another frisian flag: [3]. Segregated separatists? --Ben Ben (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough independent sources for WP:GNG. Sorry, Ing(v)a(r)s Tochter. Not all related to germanic languages is generally notable. --Ben Ben (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
- Weak delete Just not enough coverage. The group is too small, at present, to generate significant coverage, and given the "success" of the Frisian National Party is unlikely to grow. --Bejnar (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.